Project Info

Ai red teaming arena

Devpost

Inspiration

AI systems can fail in ways traditional tests miss — through prompt injection, data leakage, unsafe tool use, and jailbreaks. We built Red-Team Arena to make AI security testing repeatable, measurable, and useful to development teams. What It Does Red-Team Arena launches adversarial red-team and defensive blue-team agents against AI applications. It records every attack, response, guardrail decision, and outcome, then converts failures into evidence-backed remediation proposals for human review. It also provides: Versioned security-test corpora Model-to-tool attack-path analysis Reproducible before-and-after testing CI release gates Protection against regressions and false positives How We Built It We used Laravel, PHP, PostgreSQL, Redis, and Docker Compose. LLM providers are integrated through a shared HTTP client, while imported test corpora are fingerprinted with SHA-256 for reproducibility. We model risk conceptually as: $$ R \propto \text{Reachability} \times \text{Sensitivity} \times \text{Control Gaps} $$ The platform stores complete execution traces so every finding can be connected to the exact input, model response, control decision, and remediation test. Challenges Our biggest challenges were keeping AI-generated attacks realistic while making results deterministic, preserving legitimate behavior while blocking attacks, and maintaining compatibility between Laravel 8 and PHP 8.5. We also ensured optional or unavailable controls were reported honestly instead of being presented as successful protections. What We Learned We learned that AI security requires more than detecting harmful output. Teams need reproducible evidence, attack-path visibility, regression testing, and human approval before applying AI-generated fixes. The result is a platform that does not simply find vulnerabilities — it helps teams prove they fixed them.

Analysis

Compare with all teams

View

Metric

Figures cover GitHub contributors during the hackathon window. A co-authored commit counts in full for each author, so per-member totals add up to more than the whole-team figures.

Technology

Found in codeClaimed only
  • CSSIn code
  • FastAPIIn code
  • JavaScriptIn code
  • PHPIn code
  • PythonIn code
  • Tailwind CSSIn code
  • DockerClaimed
  • Hugging FaceClaimed
  • Next.jsClaimed
  • PostgreSQLClaimed
  • RedisClaimed

6 of 11 appear in the indexed code. 5 claimed on Devpost could not be matched to code, which may simply mean the tool leaves no trace in the repository.

AI coding agents

  • Claude CodeCommits
  • CodexConfig

Detected from committed agent config files and commit authorship. Absence of a signal is not proof an agent was unused.

Codebase size

Source size

427 KB

Source files

67

Counts recognized source files only; vendored directories, binaries and lockfiles are excluded, so this is smaller than the repository on disk.

0 stars