Project Info
Inspiration
Maintaining quality documentation is a time consuming and difficult task and is also prone to falsification and misrepresentation which is why we wanted to automate these processes by leveraging Anthropic's AI capabilities.
What it does
Our tool uses Claude to analyze changes in a repo and create commit messages and documentation that accurately reflect the content and impact of the changes. By inputting the repo url our tool also analyzes all contributions to highlight top contributors based on the number of quality commits.
How we built it
We used the MERN stack to develop the website, and utilized the Agentic SDK to handle our LLM API calls. The commit cli was developed in Python which also interfaced with MongoDB, our database, and anthropic's claude to produce commit messages, code evals, and comprehensive documentation.
Challenges we ran into
We were having trouble managing the database in a way that didn't interfere with the various API calls that we had through the project. We also had trouble getting structured output from Claude API calls. However, we were eventually able to achieve consistent structured output through a workaround. Same issues plagued the cli until a way to manage api_keys properly was found.
Accomplishments we're proud of
This is a tool we would actually use in our workflow and we learned new skills that will contribute to our professional development
What we learned
For some of our team we learned how to create command line interfaces and manage APIs, for others we learned how to use React and front-end development principles
What's next
for GitGenie Making it scalable for larger repos, and optimization of our algorithms and data structures . Additionally, it would be cool to create custom classification network or a custom AI agent to better classify commits.
Analysis
View
Metric
- 71
- 22
- 15
Figures cover GitHub contributors during the hackathon window. A co-authored commit counts in full for each author, so per-member totals add up to more than the whole-team figures.
Technology
- AnthropicIn code
- CSSIn code
- ExpressIn code
- HTMLIn code
- JavaScriptIn code
- MongoDBIn code
- PythonIn code
- ReactIn code
- Node.jsClaimed
8 of 9 appear in the indexed code. 1 claimed on Devpost could not be matched to code, which may simply mean the tool leaves no trace in the repository.
AI coding agents
No AI coding agent signals were found in this repository.
Detected from committed agent config files and commit authorship. Absence of a signal is not proof an agent was unused.
Codebase size
Source size
52 KB
Source files
20
Counts recognized source files only; vendored directories, binaries and lockfiles are excluded, so this is smaller than the repository on disk.
Repository
Aaryan-Bidaye/GitScribe
31 files · 361 KB · @ f27968c
Structure
Interface
5 files · 16%Screens, components and styles rendered to the user.
Application logic
8 files · 26%Domain rules, services and shared utilities.
Supporting
Layers are inferred from where files sit in the tree, not from reading the code. A project that names its directories unconventionally will read oddly here — open the file browser to check anything the diagram implies.
Languages
- JavaScript38%
- CSS29%
- Python22%
- Markdown11%
- HTML1%
Share of indexed source by file size. Binary and vendored files are excluded.
Dependencies
website/package.json
npm · 14- @anthropic-ai/sdk
- axios
- react
- react-dom
- react-router-dom
- +9 more
backend/package.json
npm · 7- @anthropic-ai/sdk
- cors
- dotenv
- express
- mongoose
- morgan
- +1 more
Declared in the repository’s manifests at the indexed commit. A declared package is not proof it is used, and runtime dependencies are listed first.
This project’s features have not been analysed yet.
Export this project's context (description, README, evidence, key source files) to chat with an AI agent elsewhere.